Async Policies: Top Reasons They Fail and How to Fix Them

Too many teams announce “async” then slip back into meetings and pings. This guide shows why async policies fail, how to fix them, and what to track so distributed teams move faster with less chaos.

By Remotly 8 min read
Three professionals work at night with laptops and a tablet under a desk lamp, illustrating remote team collaboration across time zones in Singapore, London and New York.
Remote team collaborating after hours across Singapore, London and New York. Real work, flexible schedules, async communication.

Async policies promise fewer meetings and more focus. Yet many teams still drown in emails, ad-hoc calls, and status updates. If your async policies are not sticking, you are not alone.

In this playbook you will learn the top reasons async policies fail, how to fix each one, and what to measure to make improvements visible. You will also get a ready-to-use comparison table, a chart suggestion, and a short FAQ to help you roll out changes with confidence.

CTA Image

Imagine doing great work from anywhere and still growing your career. Browse Remotly’s fresh remote roles and let your next adventure begin.

Find your future

Key Takeaways

  • Most async failures come from unclear response norms, weak documentation, and tool sprawl.
  • Write it down. Treat “single source of truth” as a product, not a document.
  • Define explicit response-time SLAs by channel and time zone.
  • Reduce tools. Map every message type to one home and archive the rest.
  • Measure three things monthly: interruptions per day, meeting time, and % of decisions documented.

Why async policies fail (and how to fix each one)

1) No documentation muscle

The failure. Work lives in chat threads and unrecorded calls, so people must ask to learn.

Why it matters. GitLab summarizes the core principle well: “At its core, asynchronous communication is documentation.” (The GitLab Handbook)

Fixes.

  • Adopt a handbook-first rule. If it is not in the handbook, it does not exist. (The GitLab Handbook)
  • Require agendas and notes for any meeting that happens. Notes are linked back to the handbook or tracking issue. (The GitLab Handbook)
  • Track a KPI: % of decisions with a link.

Evidence to prioritize this. Microsoft’s 2025 Work Trend Index found workers receive on average 117 emails and 153 Teams messages per day and are interrupted roughly every two minutes. Without solid documentation, people chase clarity all day. The study analyzed Microsoft 365 signals and surveyed 31,000 knowledge workers across 31 markets. (Source)


2) Response-time ambiguity

The failure. People do not know when they are expected to reply, so everything feels urgent.

Fixes.

  • Publish channel SLAs. Example: Issues within 2 business days; docs comments 1 day; chat messages next business day.
  • Set team time-zone windows for optional overlap; everything else is async by default.
  • Use channel prefixes like [Decision], [FYI], [Blocker].

Evidence. Microsoft reports 57% of meetings are ad-hoc and 29% of employees check email after 10 p.m., symptoms of unclear norms. (Source, HR Dive)


3) Tool sprawl and context switching

The failure. Work is split across too many apps, increasing toggling and cognitive load.

Fixes.

  • Map message types → one tool. For example: decisions in issues, specs in wiki, updates via async video, chat for handshakes.
  • Decommission or archive channels that duplicate function.
  • Reserve a weekly “system cleanup” hour to merge and tag content.

Evidence. Asana’s Anatomy of Work (2022) found global knowledge workers use about 10 apps and switch 25 times per day, based on 10,000+ workers worldwide. (resources.asana.com)


4) Decisions lack owners

The failure. Threads grow long, then stall.

Fixes.

  • Assign a DRI (directly responsible individual) to every decision with a deadline and success criteria.
  • Capture the decision in your handbook or tracker with the rationale and link to source data. (The GitLab Handbook)

5) “Async” becomes “always on”

The failure. Teams call it async but expect instant replies. Burnout rises.

Fixes.

  • Set quiet hours and turn on do-not-disturb defaults.
  • Move status to weekly written or recorded updates; discuss only blockers live.
  • Leaders model behavior by using delayed send and never asking for instant replies.

Evidence. Microsoft’s 2025 study shows the “infinite workday” pattern: evening meetings up 16%, nearly a third back in email by 10 p.m., and 275 interruptions per day. (Source)


6) Writing quality is poor

The failure. Sparse or unclear writing forces follow-ups and meetings.

Fixes.

  • Provide short writing guides and templates for status updates, decision memos, and RFCs.
  • Encourage “anticipate the reader”: add context, links, and decisions in one place. (The GitLab Handbook)
CTA Image

Imagine doing great work from anywhere and still growing your career. Browse Remotly’s fresh remote roles and let your next adventure begin.

Find your future

7) No training or onboarding to async

The failure. New hires copy habits from old workflows, not the policy.

Fixes.

  • Add an Async 101 module to onboarding with a shadowed example and a practice PRD or update.
  • Pair a handbook steward role on each team for the first 90 days.

8) Wrong work is done synchronously

The failure. Status and reviews sit in recurring meetings.

Fixes.

  • Use async video updates for demos and announcements; thread feedback.
  • Reserve live time for decisions, conflict resolution, and creative jams only.

Evidence. Buffer’s 2022 survey of 2,118 remote workers found only 38% of companies had an async-first policy, which helps explain meeting creep. (Buffer)


Original comparison table: common failure patterns and fixes

Failure pattern Observable symptom Risk What good looks like First fix to try
No single source of truth People ask repeat questions Rework, delays Handbook links in every task “If it is not linked, it is not done” rule (The GitLab Handbook)
Response-time ambiguity Pings late at night Burnout Channel SLAs by time zone Publish SLAs in the handbook; auto-reply templates (Source)
Tool sprawl Work spread across chat, docs, email Lost context One home per message type Consolidation map; archive duplicative channels (resources.asana.com)
Decisions without owners Long threads, no closure Slow delivery Named DRI and due date DRI field in issue template
“Async” equals “always on” Evening emails, ad-hoc calls Fatigue Clear quiet hours Delay-send and status updates weekly (Source)
Weak writing Many clarifying questions Meeting creep Complete, link-rich updates Templates for status, RFCs, decisions (The GitLab Handbook)

Expert view

“At its core, asynchronous communication is documentation.”

GitLab Handbook, Asynchronous Communication page. (The GitLab Handbook)

If you adopt only one practice, make it this one. Write for the future reader and link everything.


What to measure each month

  1. Interruptions per person per day (email + chat notifications + meetings). Use analytics from your tools. Benchmark against the WTI averages. (Source)
  2. % of meetings with notes and a decision.
  3. % of work items with a handbook or issue link.
  4. Response-time SLA adherence by channel.

Conclusion

Async will not work by decree. It works when you reduce ambiguity, concentrate information in a single source of truth, and measure the right signals. Start with documentation, SLAs, and tool consolidation. Then track interruptions and documented decisions to prove progress.

CTA Image

Imagine doing great work from anywhere and still growing your career. Browse Remotly’s fresh remote roles and let your next adventure begin.

Find your future

Methodology

This guide synthesizes primary sources and practitioner playbooks published between 2022 and 2025. We prioritized official research with transparent sample sizes: Microsoft’s Work Trend Index Special Report (signals plus a survey of 31,000 workers, 2025), Buffer’s State of Remote Work 2022 (n = 2,118), and Asana’s Anatomy of Work 2022 (n = 10,000+). We combined these with GitLab’s open handbook for operational practices. We did not include vendor claims without a public study or methodology. (Source, Buffer, resources.asana.com, The GitLab Handbook)


FAQ

How many tools are too many for async?

Enough that people hesitate about where to post. Asana’s global study found workers use about 10 apps and switch 25 times per day. Consolidate to one home per message type. (resources.asana.com)

What is a reasonable response-time SLA for async?

Common defaults: issues within 2 business days, docs comments in 1 day, chat by next business day, emergencies by phone. Adjust for your time zones.

Is async realistic for time-critical work?

Yes, if you separate urgent from important. Keep a clear “urgent” path and push everything else to documented async flows.

How do we keep async from becoming always-on?

Publish quiet hours, delay send, and move status to weekly written or recorded updates. Microsoft’s 2025 data highlights the risk of after-hours spikes. (Source)

What does leadership need to model?

Leaders must write decisions, link sources, and respect SLAs. If executives behave async-first, teams will follow.

Should we rotate live meetings for time-zone fairness?

Yes. Rotate and record. GitLab recommends minimizing time-zone bias and ensuring outcomes are written. (The GitLab Handbook)

What is the fastest starter template?

Create: Decision doc, Status update, and RFC templates. Add required fields for DRI, due date, decision, and links.

What about creative collaboration?

Use live workshops for generative work, then capture outputs in the handbook. Keep reviews async.


Quick Reference Pack: TLDR, Stats, Table, FAQ

TLDR

  • Write it down.
  • Define response-time SLAs by channel.
  • Consolidate tools and archive duplicates.
  • Assign a DRI for every decision.
  • Track interruptions, meeting time, and documentation rate.

Statistics

  • 117 emails + 153 Teams messages/day; ~275 interruptions/day; 31,000-person survey. Microsoft Work Trend Index, 17 Jun 2025. (Source)
  • Only 38% of companies report async-first policies; n = 2,118 remote workers. Buffer, 2022. (Buffer)
  • Workers use ~10 apps and switch 25 times/day; n = 10,000+. Asana Anatomy of Work, 2022. (resources.asana.com)

Comparison table

Problem Symptom Fix
No single source of truth Repeat questions Handbook-first, link everything (The GitLab Handbook)
Ambiguous response times Late-night pings Channel SLAs, quiet hours (Source)
Tool sprawl Lost context One home per message type, decommission extras (resources.asana.com)
No owner Threads stall DRI + due date
Meeting creep Status meetings everywhere Async updates, live only for decisions

FAQ (short)

  • How many apps should we use? Aim for one per message type. (resources.asana.com)
  • What is a good SLA? Next-business-day for chat, 1–2 days for docs and issues.
  • How do we stop after-hours creep? Quiet hours + delay send. (Source)
  • Do we still need meetings? Yes, for decisions and conflict. Document outcomes. (The GitLab Handbook)
  • What do we measure? Interruptions/day, % meetings with notes, % decisions linked.

Methodology notes


CTA Image

Imagine doing great work from anywhere and still growing your career. Browse Remotly’s fresh remote roles and let your next adventure begin.

Find your future